• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

critical physiotherapy network

a positive force for an otherwise physiotherapy

Member's Login
  • home
  • Blog
  • About
    • About the CPN
    • CPN Exec
  • For Members
    • Resources & Information
    • Find a Member
      • Extended Member Profiles
  • FAQ’s
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • en EN
    • en EN
    • fr FR
    • de DE
    • no NO
    • pt PT
    • es ES
    • sv SV
You are here: Home / Editorial / Innovation

Innovation

31/10/2018 by Dave Nicholls 1 Comment

A scarf knitted with different fabrics representing different professions. Sizes, colours and textures represent public perceptions of role of healthcare workers in healthcare for children.
A hand-made labyrinth game made to show pitfalls navigating the healthcare system.
The Tower of Patients game with each block representing an important structural element of patient care
Chess pieces changed to represent healthcare professionals. Guess which piece physiotherapists were.
A piece about the way patients are asked to swallow our health advice.
A complete assignment in a tool belt, including DNA model and work tools.

We’re coming to the end of a long academic year in New Zealand, so that means lots of examination and assessment of nervous students.

This time last year I took over a postgraduate paper called Health Professional Practice with a view to ‘reshaping’ it.  For years it had been delivered in a standard fashion: block study, lots of lectures and tutorials – mostly directed at students rather than engaging them, boring assessments.  I decided to shake things up a bit.

The paper needed to be much more about what made the students ‘tick’ as health professionals; their experiences, ideas and issues.  But it also needed to get them to critically examine their professions in ways they hadn’t done before.  And then it needed to take into account the ‘others’ that they worked with – their clients/patients, colleagues and competitors, managers and legislators.  So those became our learning outcomes.

The students also needed to be more engaged.  So we got rid of all the lectures and filled the paper with activities to make them reflect and analyse.  The theory content was given in pre-recorded lectures that they could listen to anytime, and their readings were carefully curated.

Each week, students had new activities posted online.  Some weeks they were asked to write a letter of appreciation to someone who had been important to their career, other times they were asked to make a photo gallery of their workplace, or design an idea tree.  But each week they were asked to think about themselves, their profession, and the others they worked with in different ways.

Over two 2-day study blocks spaced out during the semester they did more activites, like designing barrier diagrams, analysing professional lifelines, and force-field analyses.

And for the assessment they had to design six of their own activities and use these to say something significant about their practice.  They had to tie all of these together around a common theme, and critique their work using the social theories we’d introduced them to.

The students have recently handed in their work, and what they’ve produced is astonishing.  A game of snakes and ladders adapted to represent a patient’s journey through spinal cord injury rehab; a scale model of a DNA double helix to represent the practitioners personal and professional life; a Samoan dance performance to express the person’s cultural identity.

Students have written poems, built scale models, adapted children’s games, designed Prezi files and multimedia presentations, written music, and built photo galleries, and all of this, remember, as a way to critically analyse their professional practice.

Many have never been asked to do this kind of work before, and most have been introduced to social theories like functionalism, Marxism, and postmodernism for the first time.

The paper has run in its revised form for two semesters now, and the students are rating it as one of the most popular courses in our Faculty, which teaches more than 2,000 courses each year.

One of the most common questions I get asked is why is that other papers aren’t as engaging as this, because clearly when you give health professionals the scope to think creatively, innovatively and metaphorically about their work, they can do it.

Working on a course like this really shows up how dry and dispiriting our current approaches to learning and teaching can often be.  Perhaps that’s part of the reason why we’re struggling to think of new ways to adapt to the changing economy of healthcare?

Filed Under: Editorial Tagged With: creativity, design, health, innovation, making, practice, professional

Comments

  1. Sarah Oosman says

    08/11/2018 at 05:39

    Hi Dave,

    Wow… this sounds intriguing. I teach a similar class in Saskatchewan, Canada… and have been bringing in diverse teaching methods (with the same intent to ‘shake things up a bit’… but have not brought in assignments/activities to this level. I have many questions… and wondering if you might be able to answer a few… for example, how did you go about evaluating the diverse assignments?

    How comfortable are you to share an outline or aspects of assignments with colleagues such as myself… so that I can consider how I might continue to build the Professional Practice course that I am responsible for?

    I would be keen to discuss more with you on this… thanks for the blog and the photos!

    Hope to hear from you,
    Sarah

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2015–2025 · Utility Pro.