Thanks to everyone who messaged about the glitch we discovered with the first two polls. That’s been fixed now so it should all work perfectly.
Don’t forget to log in too if you want to add comments. We’d love to hear your thoughts about some of the questions we’re asking.
If you have any problems logging in, just email Jo Bloggs, our site administrator, admin@criticalphysio.net, and we’ll sort it out.
So, here’s today’s poll question:
Should the CPN produce its own regular podcast?
That would be good. I recognise the effort it takes to do a regular podcast, so regular need not mean frequent.
As CPN has an unique voice within the realm of physiotherapy it seems important to bring perspectives, arguments and ideas in a plurity of sources. Podcasts can be of help to spread the story, to assist people to listen in different environments like walking in the woods, cycling on dykes and so on. It would be nice if CPN will create an extended reality. As podcasts and voices will provide different ways of engaging with the stories next to reading.
Still “regular” can of course be on a convenient changing interval
I think more podcasts would be great. Perhaps some of the podcasts could also be a little confrontational in terms of colliding ideas, mental models or paradigms. In the spirit of good faith, good will and good humor, of course. Tough on the issues but soft on the person… The collision of ideas is wonderful spectacle that can make learning really come alive, it provokes thinking and helps to shape understanding 🙂
I voted ‘no’ because of the word ‘regular’. I have enjoyed being part of the recent set of talks, and I think as these develop, they can become the podcasts but I am not sure, until more people are able to give of their time, that it can be regular. Yes to podcasts though
Agree with some of the other comments – there is so much to be gained from the idea, but no need to tie ourselves to a specific regularity……..